Mass publicly organized basic research has its roots in the crucible of World War II. The administration of research began with a simple premise: “There is only one proved method of assisting the advancement of pure science – that of picking men (sic) of genius, backing them heavily, and leaving them to direct themselves.” James Bryan Conant, President, Harvard University, Letter to the New York Times, August 13, 1945.

However, decades of regulations have fragmented research administration. Management is divided amongst a myriad of offices that have overlapping authority over research projects. While these mandated oversight offices provide specialized support, they also introduce their own forms, workflows, and systems, which unintentionally compound the administrative burden for researchers. As a result of this compliance-centric division of labor, information regarding the lifecycle of interrelated records is often trapped in disparate and disconnected systems, making it difficult to have a coherent view of a project.

Unfortunately, the organizational structures as they have evolved are not well positioned with the day-to-day operational needs of researchers who look at their studies holistically, a project with related parts (e.g. science abstracts and work plans; sponsor applications, notifications, and reports; human subjects protocols; animal study protocols; bio-safety protocols; publication and invention reports; conflict of interest reports; budgets; labor distribution reports; sub-recipient reports; etc.) and seek a streamlined service model. This alignment gap is at the heart of a fundamental tension between research departments and central administration.

Beyond the routine project management challenges of tracking timelines, resources, budgets, partners and reporting, researchers are confronted by a vast and ambiguous amalgam of rules. Every single project event and/or change request has to be executed consistent within a specific set of rules that might apply based on the circumstances, but which rules? Given the nature of projects are fluid, the context is always changing, so the rules aren’t fixed. In addition, the rules themselves change.

The inherent complexity of research management and the related environmental challenges have collectively posed a barrier to healthy competition for solutions. The major software vendors have not demonstrated serious resolve to develop and maintain expert systems for the niche arena as there is no clear return on investment. A few small point solution vendors exist, but their generally closed and rigid systems limit widespread adoption and encourage home-grown solutions.

In the meantime, growing market complexity and heightened stakeholder expectations for modern web-based solutions are creating pressure to replace legacy administrative systems. The industry needs a solution that not only delivers requisite functionality, but more importantly, addresses the fundamental organizational challenge at the root, as one of information architecture in order to connect the research enterprise and enable a unified view.

“Whoever takes the lead in reducing administrative burden might consider a somewhat unorthodox approach to reviewing and revising existing regulations. Rather than starting with the evaluation of each existing policy one at a time, it might ultimately be better to start anew from an integrated list of all the issues that must be addressed, and then take an entirely fresh look at what rules and regulations should be applied. Although this might trigger fears of “reinventing the wheel,” it also might prove the point of another old adage: “Never underestimate the value of ‘square one.’”

– Alan I. Leshner, chief executive officer of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science and executive publisher of Science

Ideate represents a meaningful new choice.

Ideate brings order to these historically intractable challenges with both rich ready-to-use applications for research management, and an open and flexible framework that is purpose-built to accommodate the dynamics of the research enterprise.

Taken as a whole, Ideate represents a phase change in research information management technology. The Company’s innovative web-native framework solution is uniquely capable of delivering research transformation.

“In the 21st century, innovation will be indispensable to the wealth and health of nations…
Tomorrow’s discoveries will depend less on our capacity to manage the biggest accelerator,
the largest research center, or the fastest computer, and more on our ability to create fluid,
responsive networks of scientists and engineers.”

—The Chronicle of Higher Ed, The Dawn of Networked Science, Diana Rhoten, September 2007

Though Ideate applications can standalone, they are designed to work together to support tight coordination across research offices; facilitating inter-office data sharing and minimizing duplication. Ideate applications use a project folder metaphor, where the project serves as a convenient metafile for organizing all related details pertaining to a single research study.

When a researcher launches a project all related applications are joined-up in an umbrella process. The project acts as a one-stop-shop logging all changes and tracking all components on behalf of the stakeholders. As details change over the lifecycle of a research project, Ideate reacts accordingly, updating relevant administrative offices and/or notifying additional business units. Instead of separately coordinating with multiple offices and then juggling the related tasks that might follow, Ideate connects all the dots for a singular unified experience.

Researchers benefit from a single rationalized process; Administrative offices achieve active compliance and tight inter-office coordination; and the organization gains a comprehensive end-to-end view of each project.

The Ideate Framework can be deployed either on-premise in your own data center, or as a hosted solution in our state-of-the-art facility for a hassle-free instant-activation. Trials are available so institutions can test the system and build buy-in with internal stakeholders before committing any precious budget monies. In addition, license/subscriptions include a 90-day money-back guarantee.

The pricing model is based on the number of logins required, so the amount an organization pays is proportional to their use. There is no upfront capital expense for a license, only an annual subscription, which can be adjusted much as cell phone minutes are managed.

With Ideate, organization’s can right-size their license subscription to suit their purpose. This eliminates the barrier to entry that all too often prevents smaller organizations from being able to access the latest technology. Conversely, even a large organization can opt to start with a small pilot program and expand their license subscription based on its success, significantly reducing project risk.

All software upgrades are included during the term of the subscription. Ask about special rates for two and three year plans.

Flexible, Open, Adaptable… Smart.

Ideate. Smart Systems for Brilliant People